🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 424+ reviews
Electronics βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Apple magsafe charger

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.3 out of 5 (424 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$27
$45
Sale
βœ“ on the house delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Used a few times. Nothing wrong with it

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid distribution
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Apple magsafe charger

Used a few times. Nothing wrong with it​

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Electronics products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2247267

Category: Electronics > Cell Phones & Accessories > Wireless Cell Phone Chargers

Original Price: $45 USD

Sale Price: $27 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand solely-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 9869 reviews
JD​
John Davidson βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago Β· Fort Worth, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
really happy
So far, the Apple magsafe charger is uncomplicated to use and I don’t regret it. No setup issues.
34 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez
1 week ago Β· San Antonio, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
ultimate Apple magsafe charger ever
The Apple magsafe charger arrived in good time.
5 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
incredibly pleased
For the price, the Apple magsafe charger feels okay so I’m okay with it.
45 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding quality
Personally, the Apple magsafe charger is straightforward to use and it works for me. Works fine so far.​
43 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
actually impressed
In daily use, the Apple magsafe charger works well enough so I’m okay with it.
37 people found this helpful