🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 440+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage 1960s MUSI shoe clips

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.3 out of 5 (440 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$15
$25
Sale
βœ“ on the house delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

MUSI marked large ornate shoe clips.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid distribution
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage 1960s MUSI shoe clips

MUSI marked large ornate shoe clips.

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2056528

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Other

Original Price: $25 USD

Sale Price: $15 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand solely-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8905 reviews
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 days ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
fabulous Vintage 1960s MUSI shoe clips!
For the price, it is practical so it’s acceptable. dispatch was normal.
22 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Chicago, IL

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely ideal
To be fair, it works well enough and it meets expectations. Packaging was uncomplicated.
9 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
appreciate it!
The Vintage 1960s MUSI shoe clips arrived in good shape and works well.
47 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
supreme purchase ever
So far, the Vintage 1960s MUSI shoe clips works as described so I’m okay with it.
29 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
really satisfied
The Vintage 1960s MUSI shoe clips doesn’t feel fragile, which is good.
49 people found this helpful