🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 203+ reviews
Outdoor βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Twin size wool blanket

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.2 out of 5 (203 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$22
$36.67
Sale
βœ“ on the house delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

remarkably nice condition. A blue color.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express dispatch
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Twin size wool blanket

remarkably nice condition. A blue color.

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Outdoor products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1291589

Category: Outdoor > Outdoor Heating & Cooking > Firewood

Original Price: $36.67 USD

Sale Price: $22 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ no-cost dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8226 reviews
BT
Brittany Turner βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· San Antonio, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
actually impressed
After several use, the Twin size wool blanket does its job which is good enough. Packaging was basic.
9 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
leading decision
I had no trouble setting up the Twin size wool blanket.
12 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Austin, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
incredible Twin size wool blanket
After some use, it is straightforward to use and it’s fine overall.
10 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb for my needs
The Twin size wool blanket is practical and reliable.
49 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Austin, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
adore it!
So far, the Twin size wool blanket is hassle-no-cost to use and I don’t regret it. Shipping was normal.
38 people found this helpful