🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 211+ reviews
Home βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Crumb Sweeper

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.6 out of 5 (211 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$17.1
$28.5
Sale
βœ“ on the house delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Preowned good condition No cracks De-crumb your tablecloth with this binge crumb sweeper3-25

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid distribution
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Crumb Sweeper

Preowned good condition
No cracks
De-crumb your tablecloth with this binge crumb sweeper
3-25

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Home products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 771816

Category: Home > Cleaning Supplies > Other

Original Price: $28.5 USD

Sale Price: $17.1 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand solely-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3937 reviews
LN
Lauren Nelson βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Honolulu, HI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints
Would endorse this Vintage Crumb Sweeper to friends.
33 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
first-rate
Good materials used in the Vintage Crumb Sweeper.
4 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
exceptional Vintage Crumb Sweeper!
In daily use, the Vintage Crumb Sweeper feels solid so no complaints.
4 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Five stars!
Personally, the Vintage Crumb Sweeper feels okay and I don’t regret it.
18 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Couldn't be happier
So far, the Vintage Crumb Sweeper feels solid which is good enough.
28 people found this helpful