🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 193+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

vintage stunning sterling silver paj Ring

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.6 out of 5 (193 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$11
$18.33
Sale
βœ“ on the house delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

vintage stunning sterling silver paj ring around a size 9

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid distribution
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

vintage stunning sterling silver paj Ring

vintage stunning sterling silver paj ring around a size 9​

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 688921

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Rings

Original Price: $18.33 USD

Sale Price: $11 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand solely-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 1481 reviews
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
12 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
So far, the vintage stunning sterling silver paj Ring meets my needs.
19 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb in every way
it feels okay which is good enough.
35 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific investment
At first, the vintage stunning sterling silver paj Ring works fine and it works for me.
34 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker
2 months ago Β· Honolulu, HI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Totally worth it
After a few days, it works well enough so it’s acceptable.
37 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· San Jose, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Totally worth it
To be fair, the vintage stunning sterling silver paj Ring works well enough and it meets expectations.
47 people found this helpful