🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 799+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Wakmann Vintage watch

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5 (799 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$41.65
$69.42
Sale
βœ“ on the house delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage Wakmann watch 17 JewelsRuns splendid.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express dispatch
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Wakmann Vintage watch

Vintage Wakmann watch 17 Jewels
Runs splendid.

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 444917

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Watches

Original Price: $69.42 USD

Sale Price: $41.65 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ no-cost dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4729 reviews
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
ultimate Wakmann Vintage watch ever
It’s not the ultimate product I’ve owned, but the Wakmann Vintage watch is decent.
1 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely appreciate it
After several use, the Wakmann Vintage watch works fine so I’m okay with it.
8 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly what I needed
For the price, the Wakmann Vintage watch is effortless to use which is good enough.
18 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely ideal
really good experience with Wakmann Vintage watch.
31 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
outstanding Wakmann Vintage watch
Honestly, it works well enough so no complaints.
26 people found this helpful