🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 828+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Loungefly Death by TBR journal

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.5 out of 5 (828 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$55
$91.67
Sale
βœ“ on the house delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Brand merely-arrived Loungefly Death by TBR journal. 150 lined sheets with sturdy cover.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid shipment

↩️
hassle-on the house Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Loungefly Death by TBR journal

Brand latest Loungefly Death by TBR journal. 150 lined sheets with sturdy cover.

This product is splendid for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 29890

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Other

Original Price: $91.67 USD

Sale Price: $55 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ on the house delivery on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3064 reviews
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· latest York, NY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fantastic quality
After a few days, it feels okay and I don’t regret it.
30 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· San Francisco, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
incredibly pleased
Good materials used in the Loungefly Death by TBR journal.
30 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall
10 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly what I needed
I find the Loungefly Death by TBR journal snug enough for daily use.
17 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott
1 month ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
At first, the Loungefly Death by TBR journal is practical and it works for me.
46 people found this helpful
CL
Christopher Lee βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
simply what I wanted
So far, the Loungefly Death by TBR journal fits my needs which is good enough.
35 people found this helpful